Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB
От | Shubham Khanna |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHv8Rj+LazyWu6=p-k9J6wdvg69Fd2ikm-regPiS6KvbSWT+BA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 4:16 PM Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote: > > Hi hackers, > > > 8272749e added a few more arguments to CastCreate(). Here is the rebased patch. > > After merging afbfc029 [1] the patch needed a rebase. PFA v10. > > The patch is still in a PoC state and this is exactly why comments and > suggestions from the community are most welcome! Particularly I would > like to know: > > 1. Would you call it a wanted feature considering the existence of > Pluggable TOASTer patchset which (besides other things) tries to > introduce type-aware TOASTers for EXTERNAL attributes? I know what > Simon's [2] and Nikita's latest answers were, and I know my personal > opinion on this [3][4], but I would like to hear from the rest of the > community. > > 2. How should we make sure a dictionary will not consume all the > available memory? Limiting the amount of dictionary entries to pow(2, > 16) and having dictionary versions seems to work OK for ZSON. However > it was pointed out that this may be an unwanted limitation for the > in-core implementation. > > [1]: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=c727f511;hp=afbfc02983f86c4d71825efa6befd547fe81a926 > [2]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANbhV-HpCF852WcZuU0wyh1jMU4p6XLbV6rCRkZpnpeKQ9OenQ%40mail.gmail.com > [3]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ7c6TN-N3%3DPSykmOjmW1EAf9YyyHFDHEznX-5VORsWUvVN-5w%40mail.gmail.com > [4]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ7c6TO2XTTk3cu5w6ePHfhYQkoNpw7u1jeqHf%3DGwn%2BoWci8eA%40mail.gmail.com I tried to apply the patch but it is failing at the Head. It is giving the following error: patching file src/test/regress/expected/dict.out patching file src/test/regress/expected/oidjoins.out patching file src/test/regress/expected/opr_sanity.out patching file src/test/regress/parallel_schedule Hunk #1 FAILED at 111. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/test/regress/parallel_schedule.rej patching file src/test/regress/sql/dict.sql Please send the Re-base version of the patch. Thanks and Regards, Shubham Khanna.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: