Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 3:05 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 11:12 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:39 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Here, the test is expecting 2 prepared transactions corresponding to
> > > two subscriptions but it waits for just one subscription via
> > > appname_copy. It should wait for the second subscription using
> > > $appname as well.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > I agree with this analysis. The test needs to wait for both
> > subscriptions to catch up.
> > Attached is a patch that addresses this issue.
>
> The changes look good to me.
>

The patch to the test code posted by Ajin LGTM also.

I applied the patch and re-ran the TAP subscription tests. All OK.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia