Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical"

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:11 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 3:20 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Do you have thoughts about the patch?
>
> I agree with the rationale that Ashutosh states but I don't see a
> strong need to patch the code to make this a 100% invariable rule. (Of
> course, someone else may disagree, which is fine.)
>

In case it makes any difference...

The codebase already follows this rule in 95% of cases. The patch
simply corrects a couple of inconsistencies that appeared to be
accidental oversights.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith
Fujitsu Australia