Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PvEupE2peLfdaxuh1xwn4Zad-GEHd8806YKTK=EyoF4Tw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:03 AM Shinoda, Noriyoshi (SXD Japan FSI) <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com> wrote: > > Hi, hackers. > > Thanks for developing this great feature. > The documentation for the pg_publication catalog shows a 'pubgencols' column, but the actual column name is the 'pubgencols_type'column. > Also, the order of the columns in the documentation differs from the order of the columns in the actual pg_publicationcatalog. > The attached patch changes the column names and order in the documentation. > Your catalog pg_publication docs fix patch does what it says and looked ok to me. However, in hindsight, I am not sure that the column should have been renamed 'pubgencols_type' in the first place because I cannot find any other catalogs with an underscore in their column names. Maybe 'pubgencolstype' or simply leaving it as 'pubgencols' would have been better? ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: