Re: Logical replication timeout problem

Hi Hou-san, Here are my review comments for v5-0001.

======
src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c

1.
@@ -2446,6 +2452,23 @@ ReorderBufferProcessTXN(ReorderBuffer *rb,
ReorderBufferTXN *txn,
  elog(ERROR, "tuplecid value in changequeue");
  break;
  }
+
+ /*
+ * Sending keepalive messages after every change has some overhead, but
+ * testing showed there is no noticeable overhead if keepalive is only
+ * sent after every ~100 changes.
+ */
+#define CHANGES_THRESHOLD 100
+
+ /*
+ * Try to send a keepalive message after every CHANGES_THRESHOLD
+ * changes.
+ */
+ if (++changes_count >= CHANGES_THRESHOLD)
+ {
+ rb->update_progress_txn(rb, txn, change);
+ changes_count = 0;
+ }

I noticed you put the #define adjacent to the only usage of it,
instead of with the other variable declaration like it was before.
Probably it is better how you have done it, but:

1a.
The comment indentation is incorrect.

~

1b.
Since the #define is adjacent to its only usage IMO now the 2nd
comment is redundant. So the code can just say

           /*
            * Sending keepalive messages after every change has some
overhead, but
            * testing showed there is no noticeable overhead if
keepalive is only
            * sent after every ~100 changes.
            */
#define CHANGES_THRESHOLD 100
            if (++changes_count >= CHANGES_THRESHOLD)
            {
                rb->update_progress_txn(rb, txn, change);
                changes_count = 0;
            }

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia