Re: [PGDOCS] Inconsistent linkends to "monitoring" views.
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PGDOCS] Inconsistent linkends to "monitoring" views. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PvCD7E9Y7xF+9uyGafx0t+jDjawxYi4eq8pOQxFmS7J8A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PGDOCS] Inconsistent linkends to "monitoring" views. (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PGDOCS] Inconsistent linkends to "monitoring" views.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:30 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:11:15PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote: > > I noticed one or two "monitoring" links and linkends that are slightly > > inconsistent from all the others. > > - <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-subscription"> > + <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-subscription-view"> > > Is that really worth bothering for the internal link references? I preferred 100% consistency instead of 95% consistency. YMMV. > This can create extra backpatching conflicts. Couldn't the same be said for every patch that fixes a comment typo? This is like a link typo, so what's the difference? ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: