Re: row filtering for logical replication
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PugCTDwoS6Ysaocj+AjqSUuxB5qL6F=7_E2v59E9MZm7A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: row filtering for logical replication (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Euler – As you know we have been posting patch update versions to the Row-Filter thread several times a week now for a few months. We are carefully tracking all open review comments of the thread and fixing as many as possible with each version posted. ~~ It is true that the multiple patches are difficult to maintain (particular for test cases impacting other patches), but - this is the arrangement that Amit preferred (without whose support as a committer this patch would likely be stalled). - separate patches have allowed us to spread the work across multiple people to improve the velocity (e.g. the Hou-san top-up patch 0005). - having multiple patches also allows the review comments to be more focused. ~~ We were mid-way putting together the next v45* when your latest attachment was posted over the weekend. So we will proceed with our original plan to post our v45* (tomorrow). After v45* is posted we will pause to find what are all the differences between your unified patch and our v45* patch set. Our intention is to integrate as many improvements as possible from your changes into the v46* etc that will follow tomorrow’s v45*. On some points, we will most likely need further discussion. With luck, soon everything can be more in sync again. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: