Re: PGDOCS - Logical replication GUCs - added some xrefs
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGDOCS - Logical replication GUCs - added some xrefs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PuLRnyZPE467_HH3K52v2VrUNg5snmLUnwRonFAX6c46g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGDOCS - Logical replication GUCs - added some xrefs (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGDOCS - Logical replication GUCs - added some xrefs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:24 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > One suggestion: > The format of subscribers includes the data type and default values, > the format of publishers does not include data type and default > values. We can try to maintain the consistency for both publisher and > subscriber configurations. > + <para> > + <varname>wal_level</varname> must be set to <literal>logical</literal>. > + </para> > > + <term><varname>max_logical_replication_workers</varname> > (<type>integer</type>) > + <indexterm> > + <primary><varname>max_logical_replication_workers</varname> > configuration parameter</primary> > + </indexterm> > + </term> > + <listitem> > + <para> > + Specifies maximum number of logical replication workers. This > must be set > + to at least the number of subscriptions (for apply workers), plus some > + reserve for the table synchronization workers. > + </para> > + <para> > > If we don't want to keep the same format, we could give a link to > runtime-config-replication where data type and default is defined for > publisher configurations max_replication_slots and max_wal_senders. > Thanks for your suggestions. I have included xref links to the original definitions, rather than defining the same GUC in multiple places. PSA v3. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: