Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PuHs=52Ag5RH2OExm8Qg6sfBkak4OY7onfiqYZ+HJ-iwQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 6:08 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 13:47, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > On 08.12.22 03:30, Peter Smith wrote: > > > PSA patches for v9* > > > > > > v9-0001 - Now the table rows are ordered per PeterE's suggestions [1] > > > > committed Thanks for pushing. > > > > > v9-0002 - All the review comments from DavidJ [2] are addressed > > > > I'm not sure about this one. It removes the "see [link] for details" > > phrases and instead makes the view name a link. I think this loses the > > cue that there is more information elsewhere. Otherwise, one could > > think that, say, the entry about pg_stat_activity is the primary source > > and the link just links to itself. Also keep in mind that people use > > media where links are not that apparent (PDF), so the presence of a link > > by itself cannot be the only cue about the flow of the information. > PSA new patch for v10-0001 v9-0001 --> pushed, thanks! v9-0002 --> I removed this based on the reject reason above v9-0003 --> v10-0001 > I'm not sure if anything is pending for v9-0003, if there is something > pending, please post an updated patch for the same. > Thanks for the reminder. PSA v10. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: