Re: GUC names in messages
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GUC names in messages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PuDSj_knEzfXx+v9_-15XYSJAuFmpgubh8rN4nWjFMdUg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | GUC names in messages (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: GUC names in messages
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:02 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: ... > > I had intended to make a patch to address the inconsistency, but > couldn't decide which of those styles was the preferred one. > > Then I worried this could be the tip of the iceberg -- GUC names occur > in many other error messages where they are sometimes quoted and > sometimes not quoted: > e.g. Not quoted -- errhint("You might need to run fewer transactions > at a time or increase max_connections."))); > e.g. Quoted -- errmsg("\"max_wal_size\" must be at least twice > \"wal_segment_size\""))); > > Ideally, they should all look the same everywhere, shouldn't they? > One idea to achieve consistency might be to always substitute GUC names using a macro. #define GUC_NAME(s) ("\"" s "\"") ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("%s must be at least twice %s", GUC_NAME("max_wal_size"), GUC_NAME("wal_segment_size")))); Thoughts? ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: