Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+Pthu7wpO4q9Heuxq8dvMH1vhSmUFEyDCPzyJBEG8PyEgQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq
Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
(This is not a code review - this is just to satisfy my curiosity) I've seen lots of code like this where I may have been tempted to use a ternary operator for readability, so I was wondering is there a PG convention to avoid such ternary operator assignments, or is it simply a personal taste thing, or is there some other reason? For example: if (msg) res->errMsg = msg; else res->errMsg = libpq_gettext("out of memory\n"); VERSUS: res->errMsg = msg ? msg : libpq_gettext("out of memory\n"); ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: