Re: Deduplicate logicalrep_read_tuple()
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Deduplicate logicalrep_read_tuple() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PtbhRdDpL9twoCzcys8TS2R7b3hzTQBB_cU=A62UWvc8w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Deduplicate logicalrep_read_tuple() (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Deduplicate logicalrep_read_tuple()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 6:26 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > logicalrep_read_tuple() duplicates code for LOGICALREP_COLUMN_TEXT and > LOGICALREP_COLUMN_BINARY introduced by commit 9de77b5. While it > doesn't hurt anyone, deduplication makes code a bit leaner by 57 bytes > [1]. I've attached a patch for $SUBJECT. > > Thoughts? > The code looks the same but there is a subtle comment difference where previously only LOGICALREP_COLUMN_BINARY case said: /* not strictly necessary but per StringInfo practice */ So if you de-duplicate the code then should that comment be modified to say /* not strictly necessary for LOGICALREP_COLUMN_BINARY but per StringInfo practice */ ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: