Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PtPW9cSjH=WCQfYX14NpQ2qn-fqAAOigpuCbnke8JSZog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Wang-san, Here is some more information about my v21-0001 review [2] posted yesterday. ~~ If the streaming=parallel will be disallowed for publishers not using protocol 4 (see Amit's post [1]), then please ignore all my previous review comments about the protocol descriptions (see [2] comments #4b, #7b, #47a, #47b). ~~ Also, I was having second thoughts about the name replacement for the 'main_worker_pid' member (see [2] comments #1b, #49). Previously I suggested 'apply_leader_pid', but now I think something like 'apply_bgworker_leader_pid' would be better. (It's a bit verbose, but now it gives the proper understanding that only an apply bgworker can have a valid value for this member). ------ [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JR2GR9jjaz9T1ZxzgLVS0h089EE8ZB%3DF2EsVHbM_5sfA%40mail.gmail.com [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuxEQ88PDhFcBftnNY1BAjdj_9G8FYhTvPHKjP8yfacaQ%40mail.gmail.com Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: