Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+Pt2nj5hT66okV=fkzuBLXJY+Kw5p=fBW-aYfzWM1q2p4g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:54 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:23 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 11:26 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > 2. > > > @@ -98,11 +102,16 @@ > > > #include "miscadmin.h" > > > #include "parser/parse_relation.h" > > > #include "pgstat.h" > > > +#include "postmaster/interrupt.h" > > > #include "replication/logicallauncher.h" > > > #include "replication/logicalrelation.h" > > > +#include "replication/logicalworker.h" > > > #include "replication/walreceiver.h" > > > #include "replication/worker_internal.h" > > > +#include "replication/slot.h" > > > > > > I don't think the above includes are required. They seem to the > > > remnant of the previous approach. > > > > > > > OK. Fixed in the latest patch [v19]. > > > > You seem to forgot removing #include "replication/slot.h". Check, if > it is not required then remove that as well. > Fixed in the latest patch [v20]. ---- [v20] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuNwSujoL_dwa%3DTtozJ_vF%3DCnJxjgQTCmNBkazd8J1m-A%40mail.gmail.com Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: