Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
| От | Vincenzo Romano |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL suitable? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAHjZ2x6nq3_W3BxzX2tPWZE5Y-yTWXTbniqLb2xo2N+EqbiACQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL suitable? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Re: PostgreSQL suitable? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Sorry, my bad: I confused V10 with v11.
But accordingly to a discussion with Bruce Momjan, table partitionin V10 is little more than syntactic sugar around old-fashioned table partitioning.
Sub-table partition selection is linear in complexity.
Il 19 dic 2017 15:55, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> ha scritto:
Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> I've not tested PG10. But it's not released for production yet!
It definitely is, for a couple of months now. 10.1 (the first bugfix
release) has been out for over a month.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: