Re: Problem, partition pruning for prepared statement with IS NULL clause.
От | tender wang |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem, partition pruning for prepared statement with IS NULL clause. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHewXN=H2_XNqDPgkQwaW=iHyEixB1nfk5ogSP_NMzda-W7cAA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem, partition pruning for prepared statement with IS NULL clause. (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The comment /* not needed for Consts */ may be more better close to if (!IsA(expr, Const)).
Others look good to me.
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> 于2023年10月9日周一 07:28写道:
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 03:11, Sergei Glukhov <s.glukhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I noticed that combination of prepared statement with generic plan and
> 'IS NULL' clause could lead partition pruning to crash.
> Test case:
> ------
> set plan_cache_mode to force_generic_plan;
> prepare stmt AS select * from hp where a is null and b = $1;
> explain execute stmt('xxx');
Thanks for the detailed report and proposed patch.
I think your proposed fix isn't quite correct. I think the problem
lies in InitPartitionPruneContext() where we assume that the list
positions of step->exprs are in sync with the keyno. If you look at
perform_pruning_base_step() the code there makes a special effort to
skip over any keyno when a bit is set in opstep->nullkeys.
It seems that your patch is adjusting the keyno that's given to the
PruneCxtStateIdx() and it looks like (for your test case) it'll end up
passing keyno==0 when it should be passing keyno==1. keyno is the
index of the partition key, so you can't pass 0 when it's for key
index 1.
I wonder if it's worth expanding the tests further to cover more of
the pruning cases to cover run-time pruning too.
I think it's worth doing that.
David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: