Re: Moving to git
От | Maciek Sakrejda |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Moving to git |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH_hXRY6kndA1_4z6QOfVkbgvqaKrNoc=9Kss09NPkV2QBPDYw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Moving to git (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Moving to git
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > So it would appear that there are some motivated people here with more > experience than I. Is it feasible to take the source tree as it is an > migrate it to github, or a personal git repo at git.postgresql.org > then clone it to the pgjdbc git repo once the migration has been > verified ? Yes, absolutely. The repo doesn't even have to be public initially (i.e., you just do the export by creating a new repo on your workstation and only share it when you're happy with it). The nice part about this is that we can attempt migration several times (if necessary) without having to babysit it, and abandoning a failed migration doesn't impact the current CVS repo. The only issue is that a full export makes the CVS server sweat a little bit. In fact, the process probably should be such that someone comes up with a converted repo and semi-automated verification steps. This can be inspected and verified by anyone interested, and once there's consensus, we can start talking about blessing that particular export as the new official one, and pushing that to the official repo. The CVS repo is fairly low-volume, so manually re-applying any intervening patches should not be a problem. --- Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso 1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215 Foster City, CA 94404 (650) 242-3500 Main www.truviso.com
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: