Re: Multiple Tablespaces with single mount point?
| От | Curious Tech |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Multiple Tablespaces with single mount point? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAHZiM6QO6d0b9nVUpRGMEO2AB_NDsP0R+ftOFmgzVQCPZiMxgA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Multiple Tablespaces with single mount point? (Curious Tech <cutech777@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Multiple Tablespaces with single mount point?
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
Even otherwise, is the general recommendation is to store the data and xlog on different volumes a preferred way?
Thank you.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Curious Tech <cutech777@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you. I was referring to this link and that's what made me think, what if in the future scenario.On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:07 PM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:Hello,I want to know what is the general practice when only one mount point is available.1. Use default tablespace2. Use Default + User Define one tablespace3. Use Default + User Defined Data + User Defined Index tablespaces1.Using non-default tablespace adds backup/restore complications. Don't do that without a demonstrable benefit. You will not be able to demonstrate a benefit when you only have a single filesystem.David J.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: