Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:18 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I also don't agree with the idea that we should reject syntax that
> doesn't appear in the SQL standard.  We have a great deal of such
> syntax already, and we add more of it in every release, and a good
> deal of it is contributed by you and your colleagues.  I don't see
> why this patch should be held to a stricter standard than we do in
> general.  I agree that there is some possibility for pain if the SQL
> standards committee adopts syntax that is similar to whatever we pick
> but different in detail, but I don't think we should be too worried
> about that unless other database systems, such as Oracle, have syntax
> that is similar to what is proposed here but different in
> detail.  The
> SQL standards committee seems to like standardizing on whatever
> companies with a lot of money have already implemented; it's unlikely
> that they are going to adopt something totally different from any
> existing system but inconveniently similar to ours.

We agree with you.

Best regards,
Anton, Johann, Michael, Peter