Re: pgsql and asciidoc output
| От | Gabriele Bartolini |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgsql and asciidoc output |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAHNtfO52thTcV=-KD2fMVUUdTBO2QCg0OeH0OenO_6ywoy=v-g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgsql and asciidoc output (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgsql and asciidoc output
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
I second Bruce. I massively use asciidoc. I guess adding both asciidoc and md would not be too hard.
Thanks,
Gabriele
--
Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
gabriele.bartolini@2ndQuadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it
Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
gabriele.bartolini@2ndQuadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it
2014-02-12 6:02 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:
2014-02-12 0:25 GMT+01:00 Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>:On 02/11/2014 11:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:Perhaps, but if we're going to add a text markup format then we'll have
> Someone suggested that 'asciidoc'
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format
> for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and
> troff.
>
> Would this be useful?
>
to choose one out of many.
I personally find Markdown to be more pleasing to the eye than AsciiDoc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MarkdownMarkdown is really well know now, and can be useful - but there is small differences between implementations - wikipedia, github, jirabut implementation can be really nicePavel
--
Vik
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: