Re: pg_rewind and log messages
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_rewind and log messages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwHTe5duGwMx2rzBWGZOtzsRUmtycfkgay4x6N1898RazQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_rewind and log messages (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_rewind and log messages
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Fujii Masao wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> I guess that you are working on a patch? If not, you are looking for one? >> > >> > Code-speaking, this gives the patch attached. >> >> Thanks! Here are the review comments: >> >> I'm not familiar with native language support (sorry), but don't we need to >> add the shortcut of gettext into every calls of pg_log and pg_fatal, e.g., >> change pg_fatal("xxx") to pg_fatal(_("xxx"))? I know that fprintf() in >> pg_Log_v() has such shortcut, but I'm not sure if that's enough or not. > > It's not necessary for pg_fatal and the like, because those functions > are marked to have their first argument automatically translated in > nls.mk. This means that the string literal is automatically extracted > into pg_rewind.pot for translators. Of course, the function itself must > call _() (or some variant thereof) to actually fetch the translated > string at run time. Understood. Thanks! BTW, as far as I read pg_rewind's nls.mk correctly, it also has two problems. (1) file_ops.c should be added into GETTEXT_FILES. (2) pg_log should be pg_log:2 in GETTEXT_TRIGGERS > Another thing is compound messages like "foo has happened\nSee --help > for usage.\n" and "bar didn't happen\.See --help for usage". In those > cases, the "see --help" part would need to be translated over and over, > so it's best to separate them in phrases to avoid repetitive work for > translators. Not sure how to do this -- maybe something like > _("foo has happened\n") _("See --help") > but I'm not sure how to appease the compiler. Having them in two > separate pg_log() calls (or whatever) was handy for this reason. Yep. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: