Re: Possible mistake in Section 63.6 - 9.6devel Documentation

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Vignesh Raghunathan
>>> <vignesh.pgsql@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> It has been mentioned in Section 63.6 that the first two fields in
>>>> PageHeaderData track the most recent WAL entry related to the page. However,
>>>> I am not sure how pd_checksum is related to WAL. Could it be possible that
>>>> the sentence has been carried over from previous versions of the
>>>> documentations without considering the change to the second field in
>>>> PageHeaderData?
>>>
>>> Yes, the documentation is mistaken. The two bytes of pd_tli have been
>>> switched to pd_checksum in 9.3, hence only the first field is relevant
>>> for WAL, aka pd_lsn. Looking at this portion of the docs I think that
>>> it should be updated as attached, mentioning pd_checksum as well.
>>
>> Also the type of pd_lsn in the Table 63-3 should be PageXLogRecPtr.
>
> Yep. See attached FWIW.

Thanks! Applied.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao