Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwHAA_zMqirsMbGW_etxBRXJUnk6yYN1oNjMVGq0uzx6=w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> That's an argument in favour of only applying a read-filtering policy >>> where a RETURNING clause is present, but that introduces the "surprise! >>> the effects of your DELETE changed based on an unrelated clause!" issue. >> >> No- if we were going to do this, I wouldn't want to change the existing >> structure but rather provide either: >> >> a) a way to simply disable RETURNING if the policy is in effect and the >> policy creator doesn't wish to allow it >> b) allow the user to define another clause which would be applied to the >> rows in the RETURNING set > > I think you could probably make the DELETE policy control what can get > deleted, but then have the SELECT policy further filter what gets > returned. +1 That's more intuitive to me because another security feature "privilege" works in that way, i.e., SELECT privilege not DELETE controls RETURNING. Another minor problem that I found is that pg_dump always fails when there is a row-level policy for update. I think that the attached patch should be applied. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: