Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at theend of relation
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at theend of relation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwGufa=f4RWAscOyz1J76Gs-u+wmUt6oZF8YswLiMF13Ew@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at theend of relation (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at theend of relation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:07 PM Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > Hello. > > At Mon, 8 Apr 2019 19:22:04 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote in <CAHGQGwHa_dX=dRcbR5QVTs6W5mgCy3qZ2fEwREaiXpES1B2+jw@mail.gmail.com> > > > "TRUNCATE" option for vacuum command should be added to the open items? > > > > Yes, I think. > > Attached is the patch which adds TRUNCATE option into VACUUM. > > By the way, this might have been discussed upthread, but boolean > options of VACUUM command is defaulted to true. So, it seems to > me that the name is better (or convenient to me) to be > SKIP_TRUNCATE. The name of the reloption seems good to me. If we really use SKIP_TRUNCATE, we need to use SKIP_INDEX_CLEANUP instead of INDEX_CLEANUP for the consistency. But TRUNCATE and INDEX_CLEANUP look more intuitive to me than SKIP_TRUNCATE and SKIP_INDEX_CLEANUP. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: