Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Petr Jelinek
<petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 21/01/17 11:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Is it time to enable checksums by default, and give initdb a switch to
>> turn it off instead?
>
> I'd like to see benchmark first, both in terms of CPU and in terms of
> produced WAL (=network traffic) given that it turns on logging of hint bits.

+1

If the performance overhead by the checksums is really negligible,
we may be able to get rid of wal_log_hints parameter, as well.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao