Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwGPBN91LuJA7ViReTbL1mohZkEQCpYHrcEFG5rfABkQ-A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > I don't think we should necessarily give up completely. But doing a > pg_basebackup way *first* seems reasonable - because it's going to be > the easiest one to "get right", given that we have more control there. > Doesn't mean we shouldn't extend it in the future... Agreed. The question is -- how far should we change pg_basebackup to "get right"? I think it's not difficult to change it so that it backs up the control file at the end. But eliminating the need for full_page_writes=on seems not easy. No? So I'm not inclined to do that in at least first commit. Otherwise, I'm afraid the patch would become huge. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: