Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwGF5m6v_83CQ8MXHGcdzXN1U0iDfkUAfq-TryOORxBsJw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out) (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS
regression test out)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I guess. >>> >>> ANALYZE hs1; >>> -ERROR: cannot execute VACUUM during recovery >>> +ERROR: cannot execute ANALYZE during recovery >>> >>> Attached is a patch for this. >> >> Why did you cut off the following part? ISTM that also needs to be back-patched. >> So we should just do "git cherry-pick 2985e16" on 9.3. >> >> -begin transaction isolation level serializable; >> +begin transaction isolation level repeatable read; >> > > You are right, I did not pay attention to that at all. > Please find attached = 2985e16 ;-) Do we need to back-patch this to older versions (i,e. 9.2, 9.1, ..)? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: