Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should "SHOW huge_pages" display the effectivevalue "off" when the huge page is unavailable?
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should "SHOW huge_pages" display the effectivevalue "off" when the huge page is unavailable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwFv7hg=-QpU1Y5Z2H8yAPMWJS5es5p+iJwXpJ9h1pmQpg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] [RFC] Should "SHOW huge_pages" display the effective value "off"when the huge page is unavailable? ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should "SHOW huge_pages" display the effective value "off" when the huge page is unavailable?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Hello, all > > Could you give me your opinions on whether the SHOW command should display the effective value or the specified value forhuge_pages? During the review of "Supporting huge_pages on Windows", which is now shifted to CommitFest 2017-3, Magnusgave me a comment that the huge_page variable should retain the value "try" when the huge page is not available onthe machine and the server falls back to huge_page=off. The Linux version does so. > > I don't have a strong opinion on that, but I think a bit that it would be better to reflect the effective setting, i.e.SHOW displays huge_pages as off, not try. Not sure if this is best way to do that, but I agree that it's helpful if we can see whether the server actually uses huge page or not in huge_page=try case. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: