Re: pg_stats_recovery view
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stats_recovery view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwFhXiJoAOGw+RKVR5yjv_t+i4KD+fhVqhSob6ZnGX-kEw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stats_recovery view (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stats_recovery view
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> --On 15. Januar 2012 02:50:00 -0500 Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Attached is a patch thats implements a pg_stat_recovery view that >>>>> keeps counters about processed wal records. I just notice that it >>>>> still lacks documentation but i will add it during the week. >>>> >>>> >> >> Before reviewing the patch, I'd like to know: what's the purpose of this view? >> It's only debug purpose? ISTM that most users don't care about this view at all. >> > > yeah! you're right. most users won't care about it... did i tell that > i added a track_recovery GUC so only users that wanted pay for it? i > probably did not tell that :D If only core developer is interested in this view, ISTM that short description for each WAL record is not required because he or she can know the meaning of each WAL record by reading the source code. No? Adding short descriptions for every WAL records seems to be overkill. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: