Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwFas83BLg+PApHBiSn5GF=y1-BxkR_TXbbYfSM3num4CQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record
in pg_controldata's result
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We can use >> pg_xlogfile_name function to calculate that, but it cannot be executed in >> the standby. Another problem is that pg_xlogfile_name always uses >> current timeline for the calculation, so if the reported timeline is not >> the same as current one, pg_xlogfile_name cannot return the correct WAL >> file name. Making pg_controldata report that WAL file name gets rid of >> such a complexity. >> > > i would think that pg_xlogfile_name() is not allowed in the standby > because ThisTimelineId is not very well defined in recovery but if you > extend pg_xlogfile_name() to also receive a timelineid as you > suggested in [1] then that version of the function could be allowed in > the standby. > or there is something else i'm missing? > > is that enough for you to solve your problem? Yes, we can more easily calculate the cutoff point by using that extended pg_xlogfile_name(). But if pg_controldata reports the WAL file name, we can calculate the cutoff point without starting the server. So I think that it's worth changing pg_controldata that way even if we extend pg_xlogfile_name(). Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: