Re: rm_desc signature

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-06-13 14:37:33 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> As part of the WAL-format changing patch I've been working on, I changed the
>> signature of the rm_desc function from:
>>
>> void (*rm_desc) (StringInfo buf, uint8 xl_info, char *rec);
>> void (*rm_desc) (StringInfo buf, XLogRecord *record);
>>
>> The WAL-format patch needed that because it added more functions/macros for
>> working with XLogRecords, also used by rm_desc routines, but it seems like a
>> sensible change anyway. IMHO it was always a bit strange that rm_desc was
>> passed the info field and record payload separately.

+1, too.

-/* #define WAL_DEBUG */
+#define WAL_DEBUG

ISTM you just forgot to exclude this change from the patch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao