Re: Cluster name in ps output
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cluster name in ps output |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwF9zFGwXVwizKwTG1zd-OY-TUTqF-FdFd889gQw8i9XFg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cluster name in ps output (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > At 2014-06-25 16:13:19 +0900, masao.fujii@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Categorizing this parameter to CONN_AUTH_SETTINGS looks strange to me > > Oh yes. Sorry, I meant to respond to this point in my original review, > but forgot. Yes, CONN_AUTH_SETTINGS is just weird. But I couldn't find > an obviously better answer either. > > LOGGING_WHAT would work with log_line_prefix support, but I don't think > there was as much support for that version of this patch. I personally > don't have a strong opinion about whether it's worth adding an escape. > >> STATS_COLLECTOR also looks a bit strange not only for cluster_name but >> also update_process_title, though... > > True. Is UNGROUPED the only answer? Or create new group like REPORTING_WHAT? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: