Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwEyjGnu4rnxGvDP0R1mRt+jjd5WPHWuJEsvE5jvSgCpVg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement
Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Hmm, now if we had portable atomic addition, so that we could spare the >> spinlock ... > > That certainly seems like an interesting possibility. > > I think that pg_stat_statements should be made to do this kind of > thing by a third party tool that aggregates snapshots of deltas. > Time-series data, including (approximate) *local* minima and maxima > should be built from that. I think tools like KONDO-san's pg_statsinfo > tool have an important role to play here. I would like to see it or a > similar tool become a kind of defacto standard for consuming > pg_stat_statements' output. > > At this point we are in general very much chasing diminishing returns > by adding new things to the counters struct, particularly given that > it's currently protected by a spinlock. And adding a histogram or > min/max for something like execution time isn't an approach that can > be made to work for every existing cost tracked by pg_stat_statements. > So, taking all that into consideration, I'm afraid this patch gets a > -1 from me. Agreed. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: