Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at theend of relation
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at theend of relation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwEuewpX2epNy7FgSMATMDz9=EWDWX1=JkUnnJPxXap5-g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at theend of relation (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:15 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:22 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:30 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:15 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:01 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2019年4月8日(月) 14:22 Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com] > > > > > >> > "vacuum_truncate" gets my vote too. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > ISTM that we have small consensus to > > > > > > use "vacuum_truncate". > > > > > > > > > > I'm also fine with this name, and I also saw reports that this option > > > > > is already needed in some production workload, as Andres explained. > > > > > > > > OK, so I pushed the "vacuum_truncate" version of the patch. > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > "TRUNCATE" option for vacuum command should be added to the open items? > > > > Yes, I think. > > Attached is the patch which adds TRUNCATE option into VACUUM. > > Thanks. > > I just reviewed the patch, it works as expected, no special comment on the code. > > Minor nitpicking: > > - lock on the table. > + lock on the table. The <literal>TRUNCATE</literal> parameter > + to <xref linkend="sql-vacuum"/>, if specified, overrides the value > + of this option. > > maybe "parameter of" instead of "parameter to"? Thanks for the review! I changed the doc that way. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: