Re: tab completion for setting search_path
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tab completion for setting search_path |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwEphPWToZ18xnGH53YH6E3JKs_C3jvrQPMMVQb8ccAGAA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tab completion for setting search_path (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tab completion for setting search_path
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> >> wrote: >>> On 2014-06-23 13:10:34 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > I would be for excluding the pg_toast, pg_toast_temp_n, and >>>> > pg_temp_n schemas, and including public and pg_catalog. >>>> >>>> +1. >>> >>> Jeff, are you willing to update the patch that way? Seems we have >>> something several people can live with ;) >> >> I was hoping not to add a third set of filters (separate from the ones >> already implicit in either \dn or \dnS), but that's OK; as long as I get a >> doghouse I won't worry much about the color. >> >> I've included information_schema as well, in analogy to the inclusion of >> pg_catalog. Is there any blocker on this patch? The patch looks good to me. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: