need of anonymous record
От | Peter Krauss |
---|---|
Тема | need of anonymous record |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHEREtvjMBJu5m+mrGQMoy5xhkjamtPSS6k73aHOnq262duGmQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: need of anonymous record
Re: need of anonymous record Re: need of anonymous record |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
My notion of "anonymous record", and the need of this kind of "higher-order type", are discussed in the links below,
"Functions can not to return individual items of a record"
"PostgreSQL v9.X have real 'array of record' ?
The first question is about performance: "returns table" have the same performance than "returns record"??
If "yes", the record datatype is somewhat outdated?
The second question/discussion shows a more deeper problem, where perhaps the use of string index in array syntax (something like x['a']) would be a good syntax solution.
Craig Ringer shows another suggestion in the (second) link.
I am new here, I do not know how, but I'm available to help... Can a future version of PostgreSQL implement some solution?
Peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: