Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
От | Euler Taveira |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHE3wgip89NYAqQMJvi-JfpTuaoT68YUfrin0AB_cLkp8XyZ-A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em qua, 20 de mar de 2019 às 11:39, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> escreveu: > > +1. As one of third party PostgreSQL tool developers, I am afraid > changing names of PostgreSQL commands would give us lots of pain: for > example checking PostgreSQL version to decide to use command "foo" not > "pg_foo". > createdb, dropdb, createuser, dropuser, reindexdb are binaries that confuse most newbies. Which tool is theses binaries from? The names does not give a hint. How often those confusing name tools are used? AFAICS a graphical tool or psql is used to create roles and databases. psql -c "stmt" can replace createdb, dropdb, createuser and dropuser. What about deprecate them (and remove after a support cycle)? -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: