Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Euler Taveira
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()
Дата
Msg-id CAHE3wgh8ikgHW-vhbX9mTje1cQP13PNZvHUFmWg=rVutjk0cRw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
2017-04-19 1:32 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>:
I vote for "location" -> "lsn". I would expect complains about the
current inconsistency at some point, and the function names have been
already changed for this release..

+1.


--
   Euler Taveira                                   Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
   PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: