Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
От | Euler Taveira |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHE3wggp=rsd6OcpZZ=1_r55AxK3G5MhZTX8_GV69ujCoRkJ7g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em qua, 20 de mar de 2019 às 14:57, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu: > > We managed to get rid of createlang and droplang in v10, and there > hasn't been that much push-back about it. So maybe there could be > a move to remove createuser/dropuser? Or at least rename them to > pg_createuser and pg_dropuser. But I think this was discussed > (again) during the v10 cycle, and we couldn't agree to do more than > get rid of createlang/droplang. > Votes? +1 to remove createuser/dropuser (and also createdb/dropdb as I said in the other email). However, if we don't have sufficient votes, let's at least consider a 'pg_' prefix. -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: