Re: json datatype and table bloat?
От | Gregory Haase |
---|---|
Тема | Re: json datatype and table bloat? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHA6QFS5k77V=Mps1ASTvDvULQ1w1sJJ-Zc5++UADTrLUTrezw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: json datatype and table bloat? (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: json datatype and table bloat?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
So, between yesterday and today we actually failed over to our hot-standby instance and the issue hasn't changed. I don't think you can have a pending transaction across streaming replication.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
is there an old transaction pending? that 'masks' vacuum from touching any tuples newer than the start of that transaction.On 10/29/2013 12:41 PM, Gregory Haase wrote:db_name=# VACUUM FULL VERBOSE table_schema.table_name;INFO: vacuuming "table_schema.table_name"INFO: "table_name": found 2 removable, 29663 nonremovable row versions in 1754 pagesDETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.CPU 0.07s/0.10u sec elapsed 0.30 sec.-- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: