Re: Add SQL function for SHA1
От | Sehrope Sarkuni |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add SQL function for SHA1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH7T-aq1bPfeQY+Bg9-POc62EgfGKeBZ7QPk97iDWv0DeYv9Aw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add SQL function for SHA1 (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add SQL function for SHA1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:53 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:38:43AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Agreed, and pgcrypto already allows for using sha1.
>
> It seems like any legitimate need for sha1 could be better served by an
> extension rather than supplying it in-core.
Both of you telling the same thing is enough for me to discard this
new stuff. I'd like to refactor the code anyway as that's a nice
cleanup, and this would have the advantage to make people look at
cryptohashfuncs.c if introducing a new type. After sleeping about it,
I think that I would just make MD5 and SHA1 issue an elog(ERROR) if
the internal routine is taken in those cases, like in the attached.
Thanks for the enum explanation too.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: