Re: 2021-08-12 release announcement draft
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2021-08-12 release announcement draft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WzntmH6kP10KHc7VtWT9OtLWdK8mph0d6Y+nP=-LHePK7w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2021-08-12 release announcement draft ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2021-08-12 release announcement draft
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:23 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote: > How about: > > * `pg_upgrade` now carries forward the old installation's `oldestXID` > value, which can improve things from a performance standpoint by no > longer forcing an anti-wraparound `VACUUM`. I don't think that framing this as a performance thing really makes sense. It certainly helps performance to not do something that's totally unnecessary, and only ever happened because of a bug in the implementation. But to me the point is that we're not doing these weird wholly unnecessary antiwraparound VACUUMs on upgrade now. Running pg_upgrade no longer affects when or how we VACUUM, which is exactly what you'd expect all along. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: