Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WznofpKtx=V4SpDtXiy+uey+pFi0xQGrmGVV4OmSZ8F9-w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY
Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:54 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > On 2022-May-31, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > This includes a patch from me, to make pruning more robust. It could > > technically be a bug in my patch, though a bug revealed by my patch > > seems quite possible too. > > Ah, I see. Well, the explanation that depends on Xmin doesn't apply to > this case. I'm not saying there are no bugs in the other two commits, > just that such bug(s) have a different explanation, so it makes sense to > revert separately. The assertion failure takes place in heapam_index_build_range_scan(), at the point that it is called by amcheck itself -- during an opportunistic prune that occurs in passing. This is the specific assertion that fails: https://github.com/x4m/postgres_g/blob/09d76bdc2528b476ef2f04c793061dcbf23372b5/src/backend/access/heap/pruneheap.c#L762 Another bug in HEAD definitely seems possible here, but it's hard to know without careful testing. The failure that we see is limited to the "macOS - Monterey" run, which only fails on this new test. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: