Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WznhqYPb_=_wwSHRWPtvSkvNXbwRfS2x5j5oAsT_PfXuRg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Hm, the docs about taking backups with the low-level APIs don't care > much about relkind now: > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-LOWLEVEL-BASE-BACKUP > Or do you have another section in the docs in mind? No, I didn't. We should definitely document new relkinds in the pg_class docs, though. > Does the attached patch address everything you have seen? What about amcheck? I did change the example query in the docs to account for this, so anyone that generalizes from that won't have a problem, but it would be nice if it had a friendlier message. I didn't change amcheck to account for this myself because I thought it was possible that somebody else would want to use a more general solution. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: