Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WznF87wZqprdWBY799OSASX92X294fHkvkWb19SrWfgTFA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function
Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >> Note that there is a kludge within plan_create_index_workers() that >> has us treat the heap relation as an inheritance parent, just to get a >> RelOptInfo for the heap relation without running into similar trouble >> with the index in get_relation_info(). Perhaps there's an argument to >> be made for refactoring plan_create_index_workers() as a fix for this. > > Maybe I'm missing something, but what has this got to do with the issue > at hand? Nothing. It might be worthwhile to find a way to not do that as part of fixing this issue, though. Just a suggestion. > I assume we'll have to backpatch this issue, so I think it'd probably a > good idea to put a specific CacheInvalidateHeapTuple() in there > explicitly in the back branches, and do the larger fix in 12. ISTM > there's some risks that it'd cause issues. Will you tackle this? Okay. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: