Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WznEA4EYSdtPTaj_sTpSBvw8EtzxnFAEtEXQK2MYyCNq6A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 6:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> That band-aid only addressed the situation of someone having turned
> off synchronous_commit in the first place; which is not the case
> on wrasse or most/all other buildfarm animals.  Whatever we're
> dealing with here is something independent of that.

That was the intent, but that in itself doesn't mean that it isn't
something to do with setting hint bits (not the OldestXmin horizon
being held back). I'd really like to know what the removable cutoff
looks like for these VACUUM operations, which is something like
Andres' VACUUM VERBOSE debug patch should tell us.

> > Is there any patch that could plausibly have had that effect, whose
> > commit fits with our timeline for the problems seen on wrasse?
>
> I already enumerated my suspects, back at the top of this thread.

Right, but I thought that the syncronous_commit thing was new
information that made that worth revisiting.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Следующее
От: Zheng Li
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs