Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wzn9GtSqYcZT+t_8Ogn_jXn0e3zhXtXjyNTnee42JyvZsg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration
Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:13 AM Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree. I believe that Babelfish's efforts can be compared with the > zedstore and zheap efforts: they require work in core before they can > be integrated or added as an extension that could replace the normal > heap tableam, and while core is being prepared we can discover what > can and cannot be prepared in core for this new feature. I see what you mean, but even that seems generous to me, since, as I said, we don't have any Babelfish code to evaluate today. Whereas Zedstore and zheap can actually be downloaded and tested. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: