Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wzmz4Z+UYqRgYHuyxYHha4Gn-aBprydmG0n+m6J2J_ABSA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:10 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote: > nitpick: Shouldn't index_blks_scanned be index_blks_vacuumed? IMO it > is more analogous to heap_blks_vacuumed. +1. > This will tell us which indexes are currently being vacuumed and the > current progress of those operations, but it doesn't tell us which > indexes have already been vacuumed or which ones are pending vacuum. VACUUM will process a table's indexes in pg_class OID order (outside of parallel VACUUM, I suppose). See comments about sort order above RelationGetIndexList(). Anyway, it might be useful to add ordinal numbers to each index, that line up with this processing/OID order. It would also be reasonable to display the same number in log_autovacuum* (and VACUUM VERBOSE) per-index output, to reinforce the idea. Note that we don't necessarily display a distinct line for each distinct index in this log output, which is why including the ordinal number there makes sense. > I wish option #1 was cleaner, because I think it would be really nice > to have all this information in a single row. I do too. I agree with the specific points you raise in your remarks about what you've called options #2 and #3, but those options still seem unappealing to me. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: