Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzmsVvd88W=uE-wSz83PjN-Lz=mme2_jxEhOVVEpEu2CsA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Ответы Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1. (now: incremental sort)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 9:05 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> So my 2ndary suggestion is to conditionalize based on the method rather than
> value of space used.

What's the advantage of doing it that way?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: