Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
| От | Peter Geoghegan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAH2-WzmPesOe=pAHnPfiBhYUjz=+yxDEawLpBBkdL-+w=E3bJQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 10:05 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > I don't think they're actually that comparable. One shows how much > relfrozenxid advanced, to a large degree influenced by the time between > aggressive (or "unintentionally aggressive") vacuums. It matters more in the extreme cases. The most recent possible value for our new relfrozenxid is OldestXmin/removable cutoff. So when something holds back OldestXmin, it also holds back new relfrozenxid values. > The other shows > the age of OldestXmin at the end of the vacuum. Which is influenced by > what's currently running. As well as the age of OldestXmin at the start of VACUUM. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: